| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS H770 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNB2AD |
| Memory | 27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190517 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 27 '20 at 20:59 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 71% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
34.4%
Below average
|
29% 40.8 Pts
|
12% 94.2 Pts
|
8% 121 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Fujitsu(10CF 196B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.92
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
20% 28.9 fps
|
19% 24.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 18ASF2G72HZ-2G3B1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
44.5%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
28% 143 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS H770 Builds (Compare 66 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H770
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1505M v6IntelBench 70%, 4,124 samples | 34x |
| Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples | 12x |
| Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples | 21x |
| HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples | 21x |
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |