TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20255

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20255  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505s
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5550M APU-$80
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 69.7
33% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 112
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 38.4%
 Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.8000
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 2.16
2% 2.85 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 4.04
2% 2.81 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.15%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 137
Mixed 50.8
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
207% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 11.6%
 Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 20255 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20255

CPU
A8-4500M APUAMDBench 39%, 9,726 samples40x
A10-5750M APUAMDBench 41%, 4,247 samples28x
A8-5550M APUAMD  $80Bench 42%, 3,681 samples9x
GPU
Radeon HD 7640GAMDBench 3%, 7,719 samples35x
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples28x
Radeon HD 8550GAMDBench 3%, 2,990 samples9x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples3x
S700 500GBHP  $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples2x
PLUS 120 GB 120GBSandiskBench 42%, 14,313 samples2x
RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 6GBUnknownBench 40%, 718 samples5x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples5x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback