Dell MXG061

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell MXG061  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 000008
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 21:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7600-$130
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 65
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 51.9
34% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 50.7
8-Core 52.3
7% 51.5 Pts
64-Core 51.3
3% 51.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS721080G9SA00 79GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MC4OC10H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 32 33 36 32 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 37.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 32.3
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
56GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 14.6
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 14.9
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.1
131% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.8
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MXG061 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell MXG061

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback