Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 993
96% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,408
87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 213
Parallax 223
161% 211 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 201
Splatting 130
150% 191 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 146%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 464
Mixed 411
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 27.7
143% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 34.3
90% 184 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
91GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,169
Write 22.4
Mixed 45.1
1,389% 2,079 MB/s
4K Read 643
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
2,530% 216 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.9% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback