Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 03:46
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 195
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 496
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 35.3
31% 34.4 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 34.8
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,442
Write 4,168
Mixed 4,801
1,138% 5,137 MB/s
4K Read 302
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 214
835% 237 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 615
487% 682 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
12GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 105 128 137 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 31
SusWrite 118
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
102GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 174 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 119
Write 105
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 174
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
23GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 116 121 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 133
Write 108
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 108
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown=> F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $403
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback