Compal NBLB2

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Compal NBLB2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Compal NBLB2
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100719
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '20 at 03:35
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 118 48% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 147 18% 141 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M 12,937 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Compal(14C0 0043) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.67 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 2.28 2% 2.62 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Afox 240GB 240GB 383 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: V6005-rm SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 205 213 211 215 214 MB/s Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54% Above average	Read 210 Write 218 Mixed 200 SusWrite 209 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 23.4 77% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 187 144% 194 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 97%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118 5,761 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 691GB free Firmware: GT001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 77 78 78 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	42% Average	Read 68.5 Write 71.5 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 77.6 43% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB 8,570 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 9.1 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NBLB2 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Compal NBLB2

CPU
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	3x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	1x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	6x

SSD
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 2,148 samples	2x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 C1RESST3HNF 3GBUnknownBench 21%, 2 samples	2x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	1x
99U5469-046.A00LF 2x4GBUnknownBench 36%, 88 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16