PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z77MX-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140106 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '20 at 02:28 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 91% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
|
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 273 277 242 248 249 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
112GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 89 92 85 92 97 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
43GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 84 82 84 82 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 75x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 41x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 21x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $179 |