Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PT  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1840-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 81
2-Core 168
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 164
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 3.16
2% 2.86 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.24 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 396 400 410 410 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 415
Mixed 385
SusWrite 405
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 22.3
134% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 34
89% 184 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PT Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback