Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	14.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '20 at 13:36
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 93 2-Core 169 62% 109 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 290 35% 268 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.89% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 0.97 3% 2.91 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 2.87 3% 3.49 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.89% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 41 146 72 40 42 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.3% Above average	Read 283 Write 246 Mixed 205 SusWrite 90.7 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 22.8 89% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 129 111% 166 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 128GB free Firmware: BBCZC3HP SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 45 45 45 44 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	25% Poor	Read 43 Write 41.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 43.9 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 30%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 847GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 88 83 97 99 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 96.7 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 87.2 63% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2400C15/8G 12GB 595 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 19.3 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 17.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	79x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	25x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16