Intel HM87

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel HM87  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 11:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 141
57% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DHP128A 128GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 33 44 38 33 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 445
Write 384
Mixed 382
SusWrite 72
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 2.9
46% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 0.6
68% 159 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 12.1
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 12.6
22% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
99% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM87 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel HM87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback