Dell Latitude E6420

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6420  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K6F2H
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 04:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 111
57% 89 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 184
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M
Dell(1028 1493) 512MB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.58
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.19
2% 2.18 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSTON 480GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 391 416 418 430 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 337
Write 371
Mixed 322
SusWrite 352
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 25.5
90% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 147
136% 206 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
34GB free
Firmware: EC2Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 56.9
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6420 Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback