Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory23.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '17 at 18:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 184
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 544
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 113
Reflection 115
Parallax 96.4
92% 108 fps
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 99.3
88% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 510
Write 403
Mixed 414
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 20.1
107% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 20.4
38% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 134%
Multi Flash Reader 64GB
19GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 19.2
Write 18.4
Mixed 14.9
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.69
67% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7MFR8A Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1 HMT41GU7MFR8A Kingston 9905471-074.A 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback