Asus G53JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus G53JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G53JW
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '17 at 16:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 132
55% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 190
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2043) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 6.69
7% 8.16 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 11
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 224
Write 124
Mixed 128
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 15.2
50% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 47.4
53% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
38GB free
Firmware: SD22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 67.7
Write 76.1
Mixed 65.3
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.23
58% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 10.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G53JW Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G53JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback