Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 12:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 176
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 286
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 9.12
5% 9.45 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.07
Splatting 14.2
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 140 310 300 331 337 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 465
Write 327
Mixed 323
SusWrite 272
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 23.9
78% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 0.7
62% 151 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 98%
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB
17GB free
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 99 116 113 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 485
Write 146
Mixed 203
SusWrite 119
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36.2
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 186
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH SP008GBSFU240B02 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback