HP Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3032h
Memory3.3 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090305
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 18:15
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 75
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 88.2
45% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 84.9
8-Core 87.1
11% 86 Pts
64-Core 84.4
5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 56
50% 61.2 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 65
Splatting 67.7
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 256GB-$203
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 244
Write 245
Mixed 215
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 28.4
95% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 162
131% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145
135GB free
Firmware: HP13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 55 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 64.9
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 60.3
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 42GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7900 Convertible Minitower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback