| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20170612 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 21 '20 at 18:03 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.6%
Average
|
52% 88 Pts
|
26% 197 Pts
|
16% 265 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4219
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 31.6 fps
|
28% 34.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
479GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 107 66 20 18 MB/s
|
21.2%
Poor
|
21% 28.3 MB/s
|
88% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
26.9%
Poor
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
20% 6.9 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 832 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 163x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 85x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 50x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 42x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $236 |