HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory3.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G870-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 164
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 160
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 6.34
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 7.13
5% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 282 315 318 322 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 418
Write 350
Mixed 296
SusWrite 296
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 33.5
111% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 186
183% 294 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85%
Great: 101%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
287GB free
Firmware: 21.00M22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 62 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 59.4
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 60.6
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-009.A00LF Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 5GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback