Fujitsu CELSIUS H760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H760  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB29A
Memory42.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170220
Uptime32 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 15:08
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 120
55% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 309
31% 252 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 1939) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4678
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 6.53
6% 10 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 6.03
Splatting 14
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57FA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 190 164 120 183 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 642
Write 549
Mixed 571
SusWrite 209
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 34.3
95% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 43.6
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 20.5
37% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 235%
Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-000 512GB
155GB free
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 268 296 322 313 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 424
Write 482
Mixed 283
SusWrite 298
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 36.1
135% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.9
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 63.1
77% 128 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 123%
Spcc Solid State Disk 480GB
114GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 205 296 224 253 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 502
Write 388
Mixed 358
SusWrite 218
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 40.7
129% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 44
58% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H760 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback