Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 VISION G  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$129
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 291
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 896
87% 715 Pts
64-Core 1187
74% 1187 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 327 322 318 319 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 348
Mixed 304
SusWrite 323
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 41.9
150% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 184
181% 289 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 104%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
97GB free
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 976 396 294 281 266 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,893
Write 814
Mixed 1,105
SusWrite 532
240% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.3
216% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 625
528% 756 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 212%
Great: 193%
Toshiba MK1001TRKB 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: 0106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 79 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 72.5
Write 77.5
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 77.8
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST3000NXCLAR3000 3TB
402GB free
Firmware: GS18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 126
Write 38.3
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 38.6
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MFAOAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 151 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 149
Write 134
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 151
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
542GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 161 159 161 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 150
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 159
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
685GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 29.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.5
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 VISION G Builds (Compare 2,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback