Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '17 at 21:01
Run Duration	91 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 1,907 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 198 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 580 57% 465 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 361.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 36.7 34% 39.4 fps	MRender 50 Gravity 37 Splatting 38.7 34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE512 512GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 382GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 132 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 144 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 1 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2048 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3973016642 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1718673590	61.8% Good	Read 506 Write 112 Mixed 331 69% 316 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 0.64 82% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 87.7 121% 223 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 4x4GB 858 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB RIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88% Excellent	MC Read 30 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 30.9 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 18 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,246x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	961x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	412x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	418x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	290x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	106x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	211x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16