Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '20 at 12:08
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$120 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 147 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 670 60% 505 Pts	64-Core 947 59% 947 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.9% Good	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 86.3 Parallax 137 58% 98.1 fps	MRender 87.8 Gravity 101 Splatting 124 88% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 340 342 346 354 355 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 485 Write 314 Mixed 247 SusWrite 337 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 13.8 88% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 85.8 106% 183 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 86%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 276GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 76 79 80 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 58.6 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 77.7 46% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 80GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 58 58 59 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 66.5 Write 59.2 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 57.9 43% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown? CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 2x8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 44.6 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 35.7 115% 40.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.5 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16