TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 11:16
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 134
48% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 291
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 47.2%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 81.1
54% 69.1 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 56
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 52.7%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310NS 250GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XR38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 41 37 31 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 66.1
Write 52.9
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 35.2
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 29.1%
 Great: 54%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
13GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Read 30.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 15.9
18% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 9.87%
 Great: 30%
Samsung STORY Station 3 1TB
17GB free, PID 6052
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 84 86 88 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 86.7
Write 30.9
Mixed 42
SusWrite 86
78% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 35.7%
 Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 859B BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 859B BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z77A-G43 (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 1,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758)

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples482x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples353x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples248x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples143x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples137x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples124x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples60x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples54x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples49x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples42x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples35x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback