Notebook W65_67SZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook W65_67SZ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SZ
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 16:49
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 47
29% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 72.7
8-Core 106
11% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0655) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4578
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.19
0% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 97.6
Mixed 58.3
61% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.14
42% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
720GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 98.6
Write 114
Mixed 67.2
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 17
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SZ Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback