Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 582
78% 582 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 145
Parallax 137
110% 139 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 133
Splatting 106
95% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 372 408 378 335 331 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 400
Mixed 317
SusWrite 353
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 38
150% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 165
176% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
229GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1196 494 397 397 396 396 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2330
Write 2,019
Mixed 1,437
SusWrite 546
353% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 94.5
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 1,378
DQ Mixed 1,159
885% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 279%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
525GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 179 171 177 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 148
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 176
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 33.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 30.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $625
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback