TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 426551G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 426551G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory90.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 119
54% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 378
37% 305 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 61.1%
 Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800
Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 340.84
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 3.59
6% 6.24 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 5.3
5% 6.51 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 6.01%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 226 209 203 200 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 226
Write 224
Mixed 209
SusWrite 213
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 29.7
95% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 60.7%
 Great: 124%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 64GB
60GB free, PID 4063
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 19 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 17.6
25% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
80% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 9.91%
 Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4A-G7 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 42.3%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback