Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y71 3,052 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 77.3 48% 70.6 Pts	4-Core 90 8-Core 89 12% 89.5 Pts	64-Core 89.3 6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 222B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	2.13% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.66 2% 2.63 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 4.61 3% 3.38 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.13% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L1 128GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT22L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 150 152 152 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 442 Write 155 Mixed 187 SusWrite 149 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 18.5 69% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 123 107% 164 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 88%
SDXC Card 256GB 3,434 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 168GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 72 77 82 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 87.4 Write 78.1 Mixed 59.6 SusWrite 73.4 99% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 2 109% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron EDF8132A3MA 2x2GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB Chip LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.4% Average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 15 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16