Asrock X99 Extreme11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory41 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 09:43
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 71.4
39% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 215
21% 172 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
EVGA(3842 1999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 376.53
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 123
9% 69.1 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 106
Splatting 97.8
82% 101 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,858
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,567
363% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 11
105% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 66.8
46% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 196%
Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
37GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 1,510
Mixed 1,524
364% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 24.3
126% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 22.6
36% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 209%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965589-005.A01G 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-005.A01G 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-005.A01G 9965589-013.A00G 9965589-005.A01G 9965589-013.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 46.4
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,064
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback