Lenovo 30BGS1E200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30BGS1E200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 103D
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171222
Uptime28.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 12:08
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 384
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 68.9
62% 74.9 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 75.5
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 121P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 754
Write 536
Mixed 567
137% 619 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 36.4
144% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 169
198% 331 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC63
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 141
Mixed 86.8
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC63
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 190
Write 145
Mixed 86.5
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WDC WD40 PURX-64NZ6Y0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 71 88 93 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 148
Write 156
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 76.5
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 54%
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.7
Write 10.7
Mixed 5.5
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
WDC WD40 PURX-64NZ6Y0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 45.7
Write 66.7
Mixed 38.3
66% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback