Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '17 at 22:15
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 217
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 679
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Palit(1569 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1806 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 90
Parallax 79.7
74% 87 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 71.1
64% 78.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST4000DM001-1FK17N 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 131
Mixed 55.4
18% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 0.56
10% 5.18 MB/s
DQ Read 2.62
DQ Write 7.39
DQ Mixed 0.7
2% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 17%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
692GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 414
Mixed 424
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 33.1
150% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 141
153% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 763
Write 611
Mixed 682
153% 685 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 41.1
157% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 421
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 106
142% 262 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 131%
Great: 160%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 143
Mixed 131
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.22
69% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
299GB free
Firmware: CC51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 119
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.18
61% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
260GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 116
Write 95.6
Mixed 104
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.18
56% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 96%
WL6000GSA6454G 6TB
82GB free
Firmware: A1.X0F.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.8
Mixed 116
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.26
84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 37.3
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 22.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99M-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback