Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 15:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,018
98% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,395
86% 1,395 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1275 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 39.9
26% 34.8 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 35
27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 346 298 298 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 493
Mixed 464
SusWrite 370
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 66.2
223% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 360
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 129%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 31.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 33.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback