Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120312
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '20 at 13:27
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 65.3 2-Core 113 56% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 244 28% 217 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 72.7 Parallax 63.6 59% 69.6 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 70.2 57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 374 393 399 408 413 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 356 Write 404 Mixed 275 SusWrite 390 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 35.9 126% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 212 170% 239 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 272GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 119 118 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 116 Write 107 Mixed 62 SusWrite 118 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 88%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 79GB free Firmware: CT100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 62 63 62 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 45 Write 29.7 Mixed 26 SusWrite 61.9 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 466GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 113 112 112 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	53% Above average	Read 154 Write 134 Mixed 39 SusWrite 112 140% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 62%
ASMT 2115 1TB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 484GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 95 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 82 Write 83 Mixed 48.2 SusWrite 93.8 104% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 189%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 28GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 15.7 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 19.4 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 66% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 17.4 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	74x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	50x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	14x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	161x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	66x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16