HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1985
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateAug 17 '20 at 19:53
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5150M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 46
2-Core 71.2
38% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 70.5
8-Core 69.4
9% 69.9 Pts
64-Core 64.9
4% 64.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
HP(103C 1985) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 1.09
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 50 73 87 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 76.4
Write 17.4
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 77.5
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1HS 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback