Acer Switch SA5-271

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Switch SA5-271  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Hawaii
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '20 at 07:49
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 104
49% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 111E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 4.88
4% 5.82 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.47
Splatting 11.4
6% 7.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 68 43 27 68 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 411
Write 279
Mixed 332
SusWrite 78.9
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 25.5
99% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 183
174% 271 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 78%
SDXC Card 64GB
16GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 16 25 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 25
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 23.5
34% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
90% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L256M32D1PF-10 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.9
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Switch SA5-271 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Switch SA5-271

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback