Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '17 at 05:44
Run Duration916 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 142
60% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 456
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 144
Parallax 122
105% 132 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 137
Splatting 111
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 493
Write 386
Mixed 401
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 34.8
127% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 55.4
59% 100 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 134%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
78GB free
Firmware: 02.06M02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 37
Mixed 36.4
28% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.29
66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 29%
Seagate ST3160828AS 160GB
61GB free
Firmware: 8.04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 46.6
Write 45.4
Mixed 44.4
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.34
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 31
Write 2.83
Mixed 5.42
11% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.09
14% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 21%
General UDisk 1TB
932GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Read 8.84
Write 2.04
Mixed 3.1
5% 4.66 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 0.001
4K Mixed 0.001
3% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 34%
WD 5000AAKB Externa 500GB
258GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 31.6
Mixed 11.7
30% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.36
54% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback