Lenovo 80T9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80T9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 09:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 176
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 265
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 6.31
6% 5.68 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 13.3
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 80 65 85 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 63.8
Write 83
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 76.2
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4 4.1 3.5 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 4
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 4
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R6N-UH Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 15.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80T9 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80T9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback