ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevo M980NU

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Clevo M980NU (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO M980NU
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090916
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '17 at 23:54
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$172 660 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 479, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 71 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 71.9 40% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 141 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M 161 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Clevo(1558 9800) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 9.17 Reflection 8.12 Parallax 3.47 8% 6.92 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 4.7 4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 115GB free Firmware: 2CV102G9 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 13 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10393 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3465 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 383 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 219426 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 1260108860 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 34142899092524 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 3473612300 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	23.1% Poor	Read 253 Write 75.8 Mixed 17.7 25% 116 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 2.91 4K Mixed 2.08 30% 7.42 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 46%
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102G9 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 38 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11301 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3460 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 467 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 278615 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 592121390 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 30912012300127 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 2346657837 (E8) Unknown 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	27.8% Poor	Read 253 Write 67.3 Mixed 117 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 3.82 4K Mixed 11.8 44% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback