Huananzhi X58

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X58 (all builds)
Memory	20.1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '20 at 21:43
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5690 4,873 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 184 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 525 52% 427 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 176 Parallax 179 124% 169 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 165 Splatting 119 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427BNR SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 217 213 212 213 212 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.1% Good	Read 219 Write 203 Mixed 209 SusWrite 213 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 32.5 96% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 175 139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 852GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 167 169 168 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 176 Mixed 79.4 SusWrite 168 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	29x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	20x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	16x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MZ7KM240HMHQ0D3 240GBBench 98%, 30 samples	7x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $107Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	5x

RAM
1x33GB^Y[fXfPV(@XZBench 31%, 36 samples	12x
CT51264BD160BJ.C8F ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 37GBUnknownBench 43%, 9 samples	7x
HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB ^Y[fXfPV(@XZ 41GBHynixBench 49%, 6 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16