Gigabyte GA-MD70-HB1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MD70-HB1  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 02:29
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 657
60% 505 Pts
64-Core 2,188
135% 2,188 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 74
Parallax 63.9
62% 71.2 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 69.7
57% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 213 284 242 292 235 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 388
Write 387
Mixed 303
SusWrite 257
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 26.1
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 236
184% 252 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 268 164 221 157 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 173
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 207
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.5
490% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 111%
Great: 168%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8TB
318GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 167 111 158 113 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 42
Write 48.2
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 137
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 168%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 158 158 160 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
762GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 130 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 79.8
Mixed 78
SusWrite 129
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-033.D00G 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 36.1
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MD70-HB1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MD70-HB1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback