MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 20:35
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
102% 190 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,251
111% 942 Pts
64-Core 2,364
146% 2,364 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 96.3
60% 78.6 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 63.2
59% 73.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 0.7 393 186 152 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 463
Write 440
Mixed 314
SusWrite 236
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 27.3
93% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 65.6
87% 157 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA-RD500 1TB
833GB free
Firmware: ECFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2615 1011 968 977 998 1002 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 2,644
Mixed 1,787
SusWrite 1,262
415% 1,833 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 73.8
257% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,612
DQ Mixed 1,702
1,272% 1,689 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 296%
Great: 277%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
46GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 61 63 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 65.7
Mixed 36
SusWrite 62.3
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 51%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 160 155 156 152 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 168
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 154
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 108%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
20GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 27 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 101
Write 33
Mixed 25
SusWrite 28.4
51% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.6
110% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G36C16U4RL.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 55.1
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 50.1
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 45.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 137%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,580
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback