Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 18:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 286
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 976
99% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,122
70% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Dell(1028 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 161
Parallax 136
120% 148 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 146
Splatting 121
106% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 330 318 324 307 304 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1884
Write 786
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 315
227% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 68.7
236% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 292
296% 489 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 194%
Great: 193%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 173 174 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 141
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 174
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 143 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 185
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 142
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.2
278% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Terra Master DAS 750GB
586GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 79.4
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 138 138 141 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 145
Write 137
Mixed 110
SusWrite 138
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-HYA 313698041100 XRMWRN-HYA 32GB
2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 30.2
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 30
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback