Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5440 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 28 2-Core 64.6 33% 50.1 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 143 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 73GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 31 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 31.9 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 31.7 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 70%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 320GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 12GB free Firmware: 5.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.4 6.2 6.5 6.2 6.4 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 97.5 Write 6 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 6.3 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x

SSD
LOGICAL VOLUME 240GBHPBench 59%, 62 samples	1x

RAM
14GBUnknownBench 35%, 9,406 samples	1x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16