Asrock H97 Anniversary

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 03:04
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 94
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 184
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 410
Nvidia(10DE 094A) 512MB
CLim: 1033 MHz, MLim: 597 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 451.77
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 285 285 290 279 261 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 478
Write 286
Mixed 182
SusWrite 279
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 33.2
134% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 117
123% 206 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 90%
SSD 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 108 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.6% Good
Read 279
Write 127
Mixed 154
SusWrite 67.1
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 24.5
143% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 86.6
69% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-034.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Anniversary

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback