Intel S2600CWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 08:09
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 143
52% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 527
45% 386 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel MegaSR 1TB
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 40 46 31 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
Read 402
Write 77
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 39
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 22.7
85% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 63.4
52% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Intel MegaSR 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 64 91 111 90 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 142
Write 128
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 78.8
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
940GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 144 146 137 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 143
Write 145
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 144
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-008.D02G 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 37.7
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 14.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CWR Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Intel S2600CWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback