Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 02:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 96
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 157
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 257
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 62.9
39% 47.8 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 39.7
33% 39.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 77 57 39 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 231
Write 78.4
Mixed 109
SusWrite 62.1
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 9.9
76% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 79.8
68% 102 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 44%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
160GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 80 79 78 81 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 74.3
Write 76.3
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 78.3
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 26
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 16.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback