Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A
Memory	1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111111
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 87.1 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 102 52% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 147 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C606) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 4.8 10 70 1.5 8.4 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 161 Write 109 Mixed 147 SusWrite 40.6 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 11.2 45% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 123 106% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 85%
hp v236w 16GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 7d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 4.6 2 2.5 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.15% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 1.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 3.1 8% 7.62 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.15% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 1,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 23.3 15% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B2873GB0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A

CPU
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	53x
Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples	49x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	32x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	104x
GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples	29x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	3x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	17x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	12x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16