Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6400 5,556 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 47.5 35% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 48.5 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 47 3% 47 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-120 120GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 100 61 61 61 54 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.5% Below average	Read 204 Write 159 Mixed 151 SusWrite 88.9 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 20.3 76% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 44.1 DQ Mixed 24 21% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 91%
Seagate ST360020A 60GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 25GB free Firmware: 3.34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 24 Write 23.1 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 24.9 17% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,043x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16