| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Boot Drive | 99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | IBM Node 1, Processor Card (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20110923 |
| Uptime | 181.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 12 '20 at 07:54 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7520
Node 1 Socket 1, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
|
49.8%
Average
|
40% 62 Pts
|
30% 253 Pts
|
56% 912 Pts
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds