Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502GU
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200424
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '20 at 03:32
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 243 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 756 71% 589 Pts	64-Core 979 61% 979 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 101F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.6% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 55.5 58% 66.8 fps	MRender 91.5 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 69.2 62% 76.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 126 56 55 59 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 1,119 Write 898 Mixed 777 SusWrite 116 162% 727 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 55.7 188% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 649 DQ Mixed 218 243% 400 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 5,735 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 20 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	363x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	196x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	167x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	251x
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	10x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	6x

RAM
M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 5,740 samples	164x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 74%, 5,735 samples	56x
M471A2G43AB1-CTD M471A2K43DB1-CTD 32GBSamsungBench 78%, 707 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16