Medion H81H3-EM2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMedion H81H3-EM2  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 20:51
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 372
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 99D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 6.53
3% 5.38 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 202
Write 56.3
Mixed 152
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 19.1
92% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 121
100% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
98GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 38.8
Write 38.8
Mixed 37.5
9% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 10.3
34% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 23.6
DQ Mixed 25.9
19% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3LK2/8GX 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-EM2 Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion H81H3-EM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback