ECS H61H2-M6

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H61H2-M6 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121001
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 191 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 361 49% 366 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB CLim: 1510 MHz, MLim: 1792 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 46.3 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 45.9 38% 46 fps	MRender 40.5 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 37 32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$25 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 191 183 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 209 Write 148 Mixed 176 SusWrite 119 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 26.2 92% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 33.8 29% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 35GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 47 48 48 54 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 71 Write 71.2 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 48.8 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 43%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 240GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 37GB free, PID 5030 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 11 6.4 2.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29 Write 22.7 SusWrite 14.6 26% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 4.5 397% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HX318C10F/4 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61H2-M6 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M6

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	7x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	6x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
BLS4G3D169DS1J.8FE 2x4GBCrucialBench 52%, 805 samples	3x
10GBUnknownBench 31%, 21,027 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16